- Open 24 hours, 7 days a week – walk in or book ahead
- 199 Vanessa Street, Buccleuch, Sandton, 2090
- Call +27 64 608 1568
| Factor | Non-Surgical | Surgical |
|---|---|---|
| Potential change | Modest, gradual, varies by method and consistency | Can be more dramatic for some techniques, but outcomes vary |
| Risk level | Generally low, some technique-specific risk if done incorrectly | Meaningfully higher - anesthesia, infection, scarring, revision risk |
| Time commitment | Weeks to months of consistent use | A defined procedure plus real recovery period |
| Reversibility | Fully reversible - stopping simply stops the effect | Not reversible in the same way; complications may need revision |
| Regulation & oversight | Varies widely, especially for supplements | Performed by a licensed provider, recognized standards of care |
| Cost pattern | Generally lower ongoing cost | Higher, often significant, upfront cost |
| Best suited for | Lower-risk approach, or exploring before considering surgery | Specific goals not achievable non-surgically, accepting the risk |
No table can tell you which option is right for you - that depends on your specific goal (see our note on flaccid vs. erect gains), your risk tolerance, your general health, and how much change you're actually hoping for.
For most men without a specific medical indication, starting with lower-risk, non-surgical approaches - and being honest with yourself about whether they meet your goal - is a reasonable starting point before considering the higher-risk, harder-to-reverse surgical route.
We operate entirely in the non-surgical category. If your goal is better suited to a surgical outcome, we'll say so directly and point you toward the kind of qualified provider covered on our surgery overview.
This page is educational and does not constitute a personal recommendation. A consultation can help clarify which category is worth exploring for your specific goals.
Can I try non-surgical methods first and consider surgery later?
Yes - a common, reasonable approach, since non-surgical methods are fully reversible and don't close off the surgical option later.
Is surgery ever the "better" choice?
For some specific goals, surgery may be more appropriate - but comes with meaningfully higher risk that must be weighed directly.
Does combining non-surgical methods with surgery make sense?
A question for the surgical provider directly, since post-surgical guidance varies by technique and case.
A consultation can help clarify which category fits your goals.